Board of Directors Performance Evaluation Results Report
Century Wind Power Co., Ltd.
2025 Board of Directors Performance Evaluation Results Report
To implement corporate governance and enhance the functions of the Board of Directors,
performance evaluations for the current year—covering the board as a whole, individual board members,
and functional committees—are conducted at the end of each year. This process is carried out
in accordance with the "Rules for Performance Evaluation of the Board of Directors," established and
approved by the Board on August 9, 2021. The evaluation outcomes serve as a baseline for corporate
review and improvement. Furthermore, these results must be completed and reported to the Board of
Directors before the end of the first quarter of the following year.
I. Evaluation Period: Conducted annually
II. Evaluation Period: January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025
III. Scope of Evaluation: Performance evaluations of the Board of Directors as a whole, individual board
members, and functional committees.
IV. Method of Evaluation: Self-evaluations are conducted by directors and members of the respective
functional committees under the Board. This process is carried out using the
"Board of Directors Performance Evaluation Self-Assessment Questionnaire,"
"Individual Director Performance Evaluation Self-Assessment Questionnaire," and
"Functional Committee Performance Evaluation Self-Assessment Questionnaire.
V. Evaluation Results:
i. Performance of the Board of Directors as a Whole The evaluation results for the Board of Directors as
a whole show that the average scores across all five major dimensions exceeded 4.9 points,
indicating a performance level of "Good."
Evaluation Items | Average |
A. Participation in Operations | 4.91 |
B. Board Decision Quality | 4.96 |
C. Board Composition & Structure | 4.99 |
D. Director Election & Training | 5.00 |
E. Internal Control | 4.87 |
Total / Average Score | 4.95 |
Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.
ii. Performance of Individual Board Members Individual Director Evaluation Results:
Average scores across the six major dimensions all reached 4.9 points or above,
representing a "Good" overall rating.
Evaluation Items | Average |
A. Mastery of Company Goals | 4.96 |
B. Awareness of Director Duties | 5.00 |
C. Participation in Operations | 4.94 |
D. Internal Relations & Communication | 4.87 |
E. Director Expertise & Training | 4.99 |
F. Internal Control | 4.80 |
Total / Average Score | 4.93 |
Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.
iii. Functional Committee Performance
1. Audit Committee Evaluation Results: Average scores across the five major dimensions all reached
4.9 points or above, representing a "Good" overall rating.
Evaluation Items | Average |
A. Participation in Operations | 4.98 |
B. Committee Duties Awareness | 4.91 |
C. Committee Decision Quality | 5.00 |
D. Committee Composition & Election | 5.00 |
E. Internal Control | 4.73 |
Total / Average Score | 4.92 |
Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.
2. Remuneration Committee Evaluation Results: Average scores across the four major
dimensions all reached 4.9 points or above, representing a "Good" overall rating.
Evaluation Items | Average |
A. Participation in Operations | 4.89 |
B. Committee Duties Awareness | 5.00 |
C. Committee Decision Quality | 4.93 |
D. Committee Composition & Election | 5.00 |
Total / Average Score | 4.98 |
Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.
VI. Overall Assessment:
i. The Chairman highly respects the professional expertise of the directors, allowing for full and
thorough discussions on all board meeting proposals prior to the sessions. Regarding major
issues or specific projects, the Chairman briefs and consults each director individually in
advance to ensure robust communication. Board members actively express their views on
various agenda items and maintain direct, open communication channels with
the management team.
ii. The proposed improvement plan for 2026 is outlined as follows:
1. To enhance the participation of individual directors in company operations during 2026,
routine communication with directors will be strengthened to ensure their insights and
inquiries can be directly exchanged with the company's management team.
2. To reinforce the briefings on meeting proposals, ensuring directors gain an in-depth
understanding of the contents and associated risks of each agenda item. When necessary,
external auditors will be invited to attend sessions to elaborate on financial report matters,
thereby enhancing the depth and quality of communication and interaction.