Board of Directors Performance Evaluation Results Report


Century Wind Power Co., Ltd.

2025 Board of Directors Performance Evaluation Results Report

  

        To implement corporate governance and enhance the functions of the Board of Directors, 

performance evaluations for the current year—covering the board as a whole, individual board members,

and functional committees—are conducted at the end of each year. This process is carried out 

in accordance with the "Rules for Performance Evaluation of the Board of Directors," established and 

approved by the Board on August 9, 2021. The evaluation outcomes serve as a baseline for corporate 

review and improvement. Furthermore, these results must be completed and reported to the Board of 

Directors before the end of the first quarter of the following year.


I.       Evaluation Period: Conducted annually

II.      Evaluation Period: January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025

III.     Scope of Evaluation: Performance evaluations of the Board of Directors as a whole, individual board 

         members, and functional committees.

IV.     Method of Evaluation: Self-evaluations are conducted by directors and members of the respective 

         functional committees under the Board. This process is carried out using the 

         "Board of Directors Performance Evaluation Self-Assessment Questionnaire," 

         "Individual Director Performance Evaluation Self-Assessment Questionnaire," and 

         "Functional Committee Performance Evaluation Self-Assessment Questionnaire.

V.      Evaluation Results:

i.       Performance of the Board of Directors as a Whole The evaluation results for the Board of Directors as 

         a whole show that the average scores across all five major dimensions exceeded 4.9 points, 

         indicating a performance level of "Good."

Evaluation Items

Average
Score

A.      Participation in Operations

4.91

B.      Board Decision Quality

4.96

C.      Board Composition & Structure

4.99

D.      Director Election & Training

5.00

E.       Internal Control

4.87

Total / Average Score

4.95

Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.


ii.      Performance of Individual Board Members Individual Director Evaluation Results: 

         Average scores across the six major dimensions all reached 4.9 points or above, 

         representing a "Good" overall rating.

Evaluation Items

Average
Score

A.      Mastery of Company Goals

4.96

B.      Awareness of Director Duties

5.00

C.      Participation in Operations

4.94

D.      Internal Relations & Communication

4.87

E.       Director Expertise & Training

4.99

F.       Internal Control

4.80

Total / Average Score

4.93

Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.


iii.      Functional Committee Performance

         1.    Audit Committee Evaluation Results: Average scores across the five major dimensions all reached

                4.9 points or above, representing a "Good" overall rating.

Evaluation Items

Average
Score

A.      Participation in Operations

4.98

B.      Committee Duties Awareness

4.91

C.      Committee Decision Quality

5.00

D.     Committee Composition & Election

5.00

E.       Internal Control

4.73

Total / Average Score

4.92

Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.


         2.     Remuneration Committee Evaluation Results: Average scores across the four major 

                 dimensions all reached 4.9 points or above, representing a "Good" overall rating.

Evaluation Items

Average
Score

A.      Participation in Operations

4.89

B.      Committee Duties Awareness

5.00

C.      Committee Decision Quality

4.93

D.     Committee Composition & Election

5.00

Total / Average Score

4.98

Note: Scoring scale is 0–5, with a maximum score of 5.


VI.     Overall Assessment: 

      i.        The Chairman highly respects the professional expertise of the directors, allowing for full and 

                thorough discussions on all board meeting proposals prior to the sessions. Regarding major 

                issues or specific projects, the Chairman briefs and consults each director individually in 

                advance to ensure robust communication. Board members actively express their views on 

                various agenda items and maintain direct, open communication channels with 

                the management team. 

     ii.        The proposed improvement plan for 2026 is outlined as follows:

                1.    To enhance the participation of individual directors in company operations during 2026, 

                       routine communication with directors will be strengthened to ensure their insights and 

                       inquiries can be directly exchanged with the company's management team. 

                2.    To reinforce the briefings on meeting proposals, ensuring directors gain an in-depth 

                       understanding of the contents and associated risks of each agenda item. When necessary, 

                       external auditors will be invited to attend sessions to elaborate on financial report matters, 

                       thereby enhancing the depth and quality of communication and interaction.